References

Adrian AM, Barrett MF, Werpy NM, Kawcak CE, Chapman PL, Goodrich LR. A comparison of arthroscopy to ultrasonography for identification of pathology of the equine stifle’. Equine Vet J. 2017; 49:(3)314-321 https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.12541

Agass R, Dixon J, Fraser B. Computed tomographic contrast tenography of the digital flexor tendon sheath of the equine hindlimb. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2018; 59:279-288 https://doi.org/10.1111/vru.12586

Arencibia A, Corbera JA, Ramírez G Anatomical Assessment of the Thorax in the Neonatal Foal Using Computed Tomography Angiography, Sectional Anatomy and Gross Dissections. Anim (Basel). 2020; 17;10:(6) https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10061045

Beccati F, Cerocchi A, Conte M, Pilati N, Pepe M. Computed tomographic diagnosis of incomplete palmar cortical (fatigue) fracture of the third metacarpal bone in two young adult endurance horses. Equine Vet Educ. 2019; 31:(3)17-22 https://doi.org/10.1111/eve.12860

Biggi M, Manso-Diaz G, Weller R. Radiography of the Cervical Spine. In: Henson FMD. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell; 2018

Crijns CP, Baeumlin Y, De Rycke L Intra-arterial versus intra venous contrast-enhanced computed tomography of the equine head. BMC Vet Res. 2016; 12:(6) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-016-0632-9

Crijns CP, Weller R, Vlaminck L Comparison between radiography and computed tomography for diagnosis of equine skull fractures’. Equine Vet Educ. 2019; 31:(10)543-550 https://doi.org/10.1111/eve.12863

Dakin SG, Lam R, Rees E, Mumby C, West C, Weller R Technical set-up and radiation exposure for standing computed tomography of the equine head. Equine Vet Educ. 2014; 26:(4)208-215 https://doi.org/10.1111/eve.12127

De Souza T, Jones R, Foote A, Suthers J. Computed tomographic arthrogram contributes to the diagnosis of an osteochondroma of the distal calcaneus in a horse. Equine Vet Educ. 2020; 33:(7)341-341 https://doi.org/10.1111/eve.13276

Diekhoff T, Engelhard N, Fuchs M Single-source dual-energy computed tomography for the assessment of bone marrow oedema in vertebral compression fractures: a prospective diagnostic accuracy study. Eur Radiol. 2019; 29:31-39 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5568-y

Dixon J, Lam R, Weller R, Manso-Díaz G, Smith M, Piercy RJ. Clinical application of multidetector computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of cranial nerves in horses in comparison with high resolution imaging standards. Equine Vet Educ. 2012; 29:(7)376-384 https://doi.org/10.1111/eve.12629

Dixon JJ. Imaging the equine neck. UK-Vet Equine. 2018; 2:(2)49-56 https://doi.org/10.12968/ukve.2018.2.2.49

Ducharme NG, Nixon AJ. Fractures of the Pelvis’, 2nd edn. In: Nixon AJ (Ed). : John Wiley & Sons; 2019

Dugdale AHA, Taylor PM. Equine anaesthesia-associated mortality: where are we now?. Vet Anaesth Analg. 2016; 43:(3)242-255 https://doi.org/10.1111/vaa.12372

Garvey CJ, Hanlon R. Computed tomography in clinical practice. BMJ. 2002; 324:(1077)1077-1080 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.324.7345.1077

Gough SL, Anderson JDC, Dixon JJ. Computed tomographic cervical myelography in horses: Technique and findings in 51 clinical cases. J Vet Intern Med. 2020; 34:(5)2142-2151 https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.15848

Hahn CN, Handel I, Green SL, Bronsvoort MB, Mathew IG. Assessment of the utility of using Intra- and Intervertebral minimum Sagittal diameter ratios in the diagnosis of cervical vertebral malformation in horses. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2008; 49:1-6 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8261.2007.00308.x

Hepburn R. Neck Pathology. In: Henson FMD. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley-Blackwell; 2018

Hontoir F, Nisolle JF, Meurisse H A comparison of 3-T magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography arthrography to identify structural cartilage defects of the fetlock joint in the horse. The Vet J. 2014; 199:(1)115-22 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.10.021

Jaffray DA, Siewerdsen JH. Cone-beam computed tomography with a flatpanel imager: initial performance characterization. Med Phys. 2000; 27:(6)1311-23 https://doi.org/10.1118/1.599009

Labruyère J, Schwarz T. MRI in veterinary patients: an update on recent advances. In Pract. 2013; 35:546-563 https://doi.org/10.1136/inp.f6720

Lechuga L, Weidlich GA. Cone beam CT vs. fan beam CT: A comparison of image quality and dose delivered between two differing CT imaging modalities. Cureus. 2016; 8:(9) https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.778

Lindgren CM, Wright L, Kristoffersen M, Puchalski SM. Computed tomography and myelography of the equine cervical spine: 180 cases (2013–2018). Equine Vet Educ. 2021; 33:(9)475-483 https://doi.org/10.1111/eve.13350

Manso-Díaz G, García-López JM, Maranda L, Taeymans O. The role of head computed tomography in equine practice. Equine Vet Educ. 2015; 27:(3)136-145 https://doi.org/10.1111/eve.12275

Manso-Díaz G, Taeymans O, García-López JM, Weller R. Application and indications of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography of the equine head’. Equine Vet Educ. 2021; 33:(1)31-46 https://doi.org/10.1111/eve.13075

Mullen KR, Furness MC, Johnson AL Adverse reactions in horses that underwent general anesthesia and cervical myelography. J Vet Intern Med. 2015; 29:(3)954-960 https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.12590

Nelson BB, Goodrich LR, Barrett MF, Grinstaff MW, Kawcak CE. Use of contrast media in computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in horses: Techniques, adverse events and opportunities. Equine Vet J. 2017; 49:(4)410-424 https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.12689

Nelson BB, Kawcak CE, Barrett MF, McIlwraith CW, Grinstaff MW, Goodrich LR. Recent advances in articular cartilage evaluation using computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging’. Equine Vet J. 2018; 50:(5)564-579 https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.12808

Nykamp S, Scrivani P, Pease A. Computed tomography dacryocystography evaluation of the nasolacrimal apparatus. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2004; 45:(1)23-28 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8261.2004.04004.x

Pollard RE, Puchalski SM. Reaction to intraarterial ionic iodinated contrast medium administration in anesthetized horses. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2011; 52:(4)441-443 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8261.2011.01812.x

Powell S. Nuclear Scintigraphy and Computed Tomography of the Neck, Back and Pelvis’. In: Henson FMD. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley-Blackwell; 2018

Power SP, Moloney F, Twomey M, James K, O'Connor OJ, Maher MM. Computed tomography and patient risk: Facts, perceptions and uncertainties. World J Radiol. 2016; 8:(12)902-915 https://doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v8.i12.902

Puchalski SM. Advances in equine computed tomography and use of contrast media’. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract. 2012; 28:(3)563-81 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cveq.2012.08.002

Riggs CM. Computed Tomography in Equine Orthopedics - the next great leap?. Equine Vet Educ. 2019; 31:(3)151-153 https://doi.org/10.1111/eve.12885

Schliewert EC, Lascola KM, O'Brien RT Comparison of radiographic and computed tomographic images of the lungs in healthy neonatal foals. Am J Vet Res. 2015; 76:(1)42-52 https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.76.1.42

Schwarz T, Saunders J. Veterinary Computed Tomography. In: Schwarz T, Saunders J (eds). West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell; 2011

Seeram E. Computed tomography: A technical review. Radiol Technol. 2018; 89:(3)279-302

Vallance SA, Bell RJW, Spriet M, Kass PH, Puchalski SM. Comparisons of computed tomography, contrast-enhanced computed tomography and standing low-field magnetic resonance imaging in horses with lameness localised to the foot. Part 2: Lesion identification. Equine Vet J. 2011; 44:(2)149-156 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.2011.00386.x

Venkatesh E, Elluru SV. Cone beam computed tomography: basics and applications in dentistry. J Istanb Univ Fac Dent. 2017; 51:(3)102-121 https://doi.org/10.17096/jiufd.00289

Vandenberghe F. CT in Equine Medicine: Another Revolution in Standing Resolution, 1st edn. In: de Graaf J (Ed). : Canon Medical Systems Europe; 2020

Wilson S, Spriet M, Mur PE, Anishchenko S, Beylin D, Katzman S, Galuppo L. Fluorine-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for assessment of deep digital flexor tendinopathy: An exploratory study in eight horses with comparison to CT and MRI. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2021; 62:(5)1-11 https://doi.org/10.1111/vru.13001

Willems DS, Kranenburg LC, Ensink JM, Kummeling A, Wijnber ID, Veraa S. Computed tomography angiography of a congenital extrahepatic splenocaval shunt in a foal. Acta Vet Scand. 2019; 61:(39) https://doi.org/10.1186/s13028-019-0474-0

Withers JM, Voûte LC, Hammond G, Lischer CJ. Radiographic anatomy of the articular process joints of the caudal cervical vertebrae in the horse on lateral and oblique projections. Equine Vet J. 2010; 41:(9)895-902 https://doi.org/10.2746/042516409X434107

Advanced equine diagnostics – developments in computed tomography

02 November 2021
16 mins read
Volume 5 · Issue 6
Figure 1. Arthrography of the standing equine fetlock joint
Figure 1. Arthrography of the standing equine fetlock joint

Abstract

Advancement in veterinary imaging technologies to assess pathology in the horses has been greatly improved since the development of computed tomography in the 1970s. These technical innovations have enabled faster acquisition times, lower patient doses of radiation and easier care of the patient during scanning. A wide range of computed tomography scanners are now available to the veterinary market, from companies providing second hand refurbished scanners, to those tailoring computed tomography scanners to the veterinary market. In turn, this makes the price of purchase, or rental, much more feasible to the industry. The financial implications of purchasing a scanner need to be reviewed to ensure viability, as well as identifying maintenance costs, space, specialist staffing and case load. However, even with access to advanced imaging devices such as computed tomography, imaging the equine patient comes with its own complexities and limitations. Owing to their size and anatomy, passing the relevant structures through the gantry can be difficult in itself, often requiring the administration of general anaesthetic to acquire suitable images, which comes with its own set of risks and additional costs. Therefore, there is an ongoing need to further develop the skills and abilities needed for standing computed tomography.

Moving away from the use of general anaesthesia for diagnostic imaging in equine practice is an ongoing challenge. The risk of related injury, myopathy and neuropathy cannot be an overlooked when evaluating the use of new technology. Although marginal advancements in pre-operative and procedural care have been made, the associated risk of anaesthesia in horses is still disproportionally high in comparison to other companion animals (Dugdale, 2016). There are also staff safety concerns to consider in relation to equine computed tomography (CT). The large volume of radiation emitted during scanning increases occupational exposure and subsequent risk to staff, preventing staff from manually restraining patient during the procedure. Many methods have been adapted recently, with these key factors considered, to ensure the continuation of high image quality and diagnostic accuracy. Within this article, some of the different systems that have been created to overcome the complexities faced by those working in the equine veterinary industry are reviewed.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting UK-VET Equine and reading some of our peer-reviewed content for veterinary professionals. To continue reading this article, please register today.